How do I stand compared to agency workers? Justice perceptions and employees' counterproductive work behaviours.
Identifieur interne : 000546 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000545; suivant : 000547How do I stand compared to agency workers? Justice perceptions and employees' counterproductive work behaviours.
Auteurs : Marie-Ève Lapalme [Canada] ; Sylvie Guerrero [Canada]Source :
- Journal of nursing management [ 1365-2834 ] ; 2019.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Auto-efficacité (MeSH), Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH), Femelle (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Justice sociale (normes), Justice sociale (psychologie), Mâle (MeSH), Personnel de santé (normes), Personnel de santé (psychologie), Soins de longue durée (méthodes), Soins de longue durée (normes), Soins de longue durée (psychologie).
- MESH :
- méthodes : Soins de longue durée.
- normes : Justice sociale, Personnel de santé, Soins de longue durée.
- psychologie : Justice sociale, Personnel de santé, Soins de longue durée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Auto-efficacité, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Femelle, Humains, Mâle.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult (MeSH), Female (MeSH), Health Personnel (psychology), Health Personnel (standards), Humans (MeSH), Long-Term Care (methods), Long-Term Care (psychology), Long-Term Care (standards), Male (MeSH), Middle Aged (MeSH), Self Efficacy (MeSH), Social Justice (psychology), Social Justice (standards), Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH).
- MESH :
- methods : Long-Term Care.
- psychology : Health Personnel, Long-Term Care, Social Justice.
- standards : Health Personnel, Long-Term Care, Social Justice.
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Efficacy, Surveys and Questionnaires.
Abstract
AIMS
To test the influence of comparative procedural justice on the counterproductive behaviours of permanent nurses and care attendants who work with agency workers, and explore whether the perceived climate of competition between permanent and agency workers alters this relationship.
BACKGROUND
Despite steady reliance on agency workers in the health care sector, there is a dearth of research on the reactions of permanent employees who may respond negatively to the presence of this external workforce.
METHODS
Questionnaires were distributed to employees of three long-term care facilities and their supervisors. Hypotheses were tested using moderated mediation analyses on a sample of 232 employee-supervisor dyads.
RESULTS
Comparative procedural justice was indirectly related to counterproductive behaviours via employees' organization-based self-esteem. This relationship was weaker when perceived climate of competition was high.
CONCLUSION
Promoting high levels of comparative procedural justice among permanent employees, rather than status differences with agency employees, should avert behaviours that could harm organizational functioning and therefore patient care.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT
We discuss the leadership challenges to support neutral treatment and avoid the development of a competitive climate between permanent and agency workers (e.g., politics based on respect and collaboration, positive leadership).
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12832
PubMed: 31349368
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">How do I stand compared to agency workers? Justice perceptions and employees' counterproductive work behaviours.</title><author><name sortKey="Lapalme, Marie Eve" sort="Lapalme, Marie Eve" uniqKey="Lapalme M" first="Marie-Ève" last="Lapalme">Marie-Ève Lapalme</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>QC</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guerrero, Sylvie" sort="Guerrero, Sylvie" uniqKey="Guerrero S" first="Sylvie" last="Guerrero">Sylvie Guerrero</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>QC</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2019">2019</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:31349368</idno><idno type="pmid">31349368</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/jonm.12832</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000410</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000410</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000410</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000410</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000410</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">How do I stand compared to agency workers? Justice perceptions and employees' counterproductive work behaviours.</title><author><name sortKey="Lapalme, Marie Eve" sort="Lapalme, Marie Eve" uniqKey="Lapalme M" first="Marie-Ève" last="Lapalme">Marie-Ève Lapalme</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>QC</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guerrero, Sylvie" sort="Guerrero, Sylvie" uniqKey="Guerrero S" first="Sylvie" last="Guerrero">Sylvie Guerrero</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>QC</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of nursing management</title><idno type="eISSN">1365-2834</idno><imprint><date when="2019" type="published">2019</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Health Personnel (psychology)</term><term>Health Personnel (standards)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Long-Term Care (methods)</term><term>Long-Term Care (psychology)</term><term>Long-Term Care (standards)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Self Efficacy (MeSH)</term><term>Social Justice (psychology)</term><term>Social Justice (standards)</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Auto-efficacité (MeSH)</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Justice sociale (normes)</term><term>Justice sociale (psychologie)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Personnel de santé (normes)</term><term>Personnel de santé (psychologie)</term><term>Soins de longue durée (méthodes)</term><term>Soins de longue durée (normes)</term><term>Soins de longue durée (psychologie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Long-Term Care</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Soins de longue durée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Justice sociale</term><term>Personnel de santé</term><term>Soins de longue durée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Justice sociale</term><term>Personnel de santé</term><term>Soins de longue durée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Health Personnel</term><term>Long-Term Care</term><term>Social Justice</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Health Personnel</term><term>Long-Term Care</term><term>Social Justice</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Self Efficacy</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Auto-efficacité</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>AIMS</b></p><p>To test the influence of comparative procedural justice on the counterproductive behaviours of permanent nurses and care attendants who work with agency workers, and explore whether the perceived climate of competition between permanent and agency workers alters this relationship.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Despite steady reliance on agency workers in the health care sector, there is a dearth of research on the reactions of permanent employees who may respond negatively to the presence of this external workforce.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>Questionnaires were distributed to employees of three long-term care facilities and their supervisors. Hypotheses were tested using moderated mediation analyses on a sample of 232 employee-supervisor dyads.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>Comparative procedural justice was indirectly related to counterproductive behaviours via employees' organization-based self-esteem. This relationship was weaker when perceived climate of competition was high.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>Promoting high levels of comparative procedural justice among permanent employees, rather than status differences with agency employees, should avert behaviours that could harm organizational functioning and therefore patient care.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT</b></p><p>We discuss the leadership challenges to support neutral treatment and avoid the development of a competitive climate between permanent and agency workers (e.g., politics based on respect and collaboration, positive leadership).</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">31349368</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2020</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1365-2834</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>27</Volume><Issue>7</Issue><PubDate><Year>2019</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of nursing management</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Nurs Manag</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>How do I stand compared to agency workers? Justice perceptions and employees' counterproductive work behaviours.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1471-1478</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/jonm.12832</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="AIMS" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To test the influence of comparative procedural justice on the counterproductive behaviours of permanent nurses and care attendants who work with agency workers, and explore whether the perceived climate of competition between permanent and agency workers alters this relationship.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Despite steady reliance on agency workers in the health care sector, there is a dearth of research on the reactions of permanent employees who may respond negatively to the presence of this external workforce.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Questionnaires were distributed to employees of three long-term care facilities and their supervisors. Hypotheses were tested using moderated mediation analyses on a sample of 232 employee-supervisor dyads.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Comparative procedural justice was indirectly related to counterproductive behaviours via employees' organization-based self-esteem. This relationship was weaker when perceived climate of competition was high.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Promoting high levels of comparative procedural justice among permanent employees, rather than status differences with agency employees, should avert behaviours that could harm organizational functioning and therefore patient care.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">We discuss the leadership challenges to support neutral treatment and avoid the development of a competitive climate between permanent and agency workers (e.g., politics based on respect and collaboration, positive leadership).</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lapalme</LastName><ForeName>Marie-Ève</ForeName><Initials>MÈ</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5858-0624</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guerrero</LastName><ForeName>Sylvie</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7298-1683</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2019</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>14</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Nurs Manag</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9306050</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0966-0429</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>N</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006282" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Personnel</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="N">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008134" MajorTopicYN="N">Long-Term Care</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="N">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020377" MajorTopicYN="Y">Self Efficacy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012935" MajorTopicYN="N">Social Justice</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="N">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">comparative procedural justice</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">counterproductive work behaviours</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">nursing</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">organization-based self-esteem</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">perceived climate of competition</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>05</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2019</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>25</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>21</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2019</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2019</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31349368</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/jonm.12832</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Title>REFERENCES</Title><Reference><Citation>Almost, J., Wolff, A. C., Stewart-Pyne, A., McCormick, L. G., Strachan, D., & D'Souza, C. (2016). Managing and mitigating conflict in healthcare teams: An integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(7), 1490-1505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12903</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A., & Schminke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 947-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00037-7</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Aquino, K., Lewis, M. U., & Bradfield, M. (1999). Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1073-1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1073:AID-JOB943>3.0.CO;2-7</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bidder, S. L., Chang, C. C., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Procedural justice and retaliation in organizations: Comparing cross-nationally the importance of fair group processes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(4), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022860</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J., Wang, Q., Kirkendall, C., & Alarcon, G. (2010). A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 601-626. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X454382</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Broschak, J. P., & Davis-Blake, A. (2006). Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786085</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Castle, N. G., Engberg, J., & Men, A. (2008). Nurse aide agency staffing and quality of care in nursing homes. Medical Care Research and Review, 65(2), 232-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707312494</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Chattopadhyay, P., & George, E. (2001). Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.781</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>David, H., Cloutier, E., & Ledoux, E. (2011). Precariousness, work organisation and occupational health: The case of nurses providing home care services in Québec. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 9(2), 27-46.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Davis-Blake, A., Broschak, J. P., & George, E. (2003). Happy together? How using nonstandard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard employees. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 475-485.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>de Ruyter, A., Kirkpatrick, I., Hoque, K., Lonsdale, C., & Malan, J. (2008). Agency working and the degradation of public service employment: The case of nurses and social workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(3), 432-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190801895510</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Heller, D. (2009). Organizational supports and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.001</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Greenberg, J., Ashton-James, C. E., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2007). Social comparison processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 22-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.006</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Griep, Y., & Vantilborgh, T. (2018). Reciprocal effects of psychological contract breach on counterproductive and organizational citizenship behaviors: The role of time. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.10.013</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Jansson, A. B., & Engström, Å. (2017). Working together: Critical care nurses experiences of temporary staffing within Swedish health care: A qualitative study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 41, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2016.08.010</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Kim, W., Nicotera, A. M., & McNulty, J. (2015). Nurses' perceptions of conflict as constructive or destructive. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(9), 2073-2083. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12672</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Kirkpatrick, I., Hoque, K., & Lonsdale, C. (2019). Client organizations and the management of professional agency work: The case of English health and social care. Human Resource Management, 58(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21933</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lapalme, M. È., & Doucet, O. (2018). The social integration of healthcare agency workers in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 82, 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.011</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lipponen, J., & Leskinen, J. (2006). Conditions of contact, common in-group identity, and in-group bias toward contingent workers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.6.671-684</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Manias, E., Aitken, R., Peerson, A., Parker, J., & Wong, K. (2003). Agency-nursing work: Perceptions and experiences of agency nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(3), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00085-8</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Massey, L., Esain, A., & Wallis, M. (2009). Managing the complexity of nurse shortages: A case study of bank and agency staffing in an acute care trust in Wales, UK. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(7), 912-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.11.006</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220202</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30(5), 591-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622-648.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2002). Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 813-838.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tyler, T., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.913</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Zaghini, F., Fida, R., Caruso, R., Kangasniemi, M., Sili, A., & Vergata, P. T. (2016). What is behind counterproductive work behaviours in the nursing profession? A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics, 7(4), 100027.</Citation></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Lapalme, Marie Eve" sort="Lapalme, Marie Eve" uniqKey="Lapalme M" first="Marie-Ève" last="Lapalme">Marie-Ève Lapalme</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Guerrero, Sylvie" sort="Guerrero, Sylvie" uniqKey="Guerrero S" first="Sylvie" last="Guerrero">Sylvie Guerrero</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/AutomedicationFrancoV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000546 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000546 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= AutomedicationFrancoV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:31349368
|texte= How do I stand compared to agency workers? Justice perceptions and employees' counterproductive work behaviours.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:31349368" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AutomedicationFrancoV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |